Stacey Plaskett Complains That Allowing RFK Jr. To Speak Will Make The Biden Administration “Hesitant” About Stopping “Misinformation”

If you’re tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Some politicians seem either unwilling or unable to pick a lane: are they pro, or against censorship? In other words, they’re dedicated to trying to eat their cake and have it, too. Take Democrat Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett, who on one hand wants to silence people like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK), and on the other, complains when faced with criticism of advancing censorship. The way Plaskett rationalizes the first of her efforts is that allowing people like RFK to speak freely is not only “insidious” in nature, and not only equals “desensitizing Americans” (to what?) but brings about a host of serious, and it seems, powerful problems, that would afflict such institutions like the US administration, and (major) social platforms. Free speech, according to Plaskett – who was commenting on RFK’s testimony in Congress, i.e., giving him an opportunity to speak there – would make the White House and social media “hesitant” to combat misinformation. You would think the First Amendment would be what gives the administration the most pause. https://video.reclaimthenet.org/articles/plaskett986560.mp4 But then Plaskett doesn’t want to be seen as a champion of censorship. And this behavior might, or might not, prompt her supporters to stop and think what, then, it is that she is championing (other than the Biden administration). And, it becomes increasingly clear that all these roads lead to the 2024 presidential election. The concern about Republicans “elevating” RKF – pejoratively…Stacey Plaskett Complains That Allowing RFK Jr. To Speak Will Make The Biden Administration “Hesitant” About Stopping “Misinformation”